In a significant move for the Australian beef industry, the Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee (ERAC) has suspended the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative—Beef Cattle Herd Management—Application Suspension) Order 2024. This decision, which took effect on December 17, 2024, halts the processing of new applications for the Beef Herd Methodology under the Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) Scheme.
The Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI) is vital to Australia’s broader efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through incentivized carbon offsetting practices. The Beef Herd Methodology, part of the CFI, allowed beef producers to earn carbon credits by improving the efficiency of their herds. This efficiency was typically achieved by breeding cattle that produced more with fewer resources or increasing daily weight gains, ultimately reducing emissions per unit of beef produced.
For years, this methodology has been considered a valuable tool for beef producers, particularly large-scale companies such as AA Co, Consolidated Pastoral Company, and Paraway Pastoral Company. These organizations have led the way in implementing more sustainable cattle management practices and have been credited with substantial emissions reductions.
However, the ERAC, which oversees the integrity of carbon methodologies, concluded that the Beef Herd Methodology no longer met the necessary Offsets Integrity Standards (OIS). The decision was based on a periodic review that raised concerns about the methodology’s compliance with the expected standards for emissions reduction projects.
The suspension, lasting until September 30, 2025, means that no new applications for carbon offset projects under the Beef Herd Methodology will be considered. While existing projects and registered participants can continue to accrue ACCUs, no new registrations will be accepted during the suspension period. This creates significant disruption for smaller producers considering entry into the carbon market once it becomes more financially viable.
The Beef Herd Methodology has been a key part of many beef producers’ sustainability strategies. By improving herd efficiency and reducing emissions, producers contributed to Australia’s climate goals and created a potential new revenue stream. With ACCUs, these carbon offsets could be sold in the carbon market, providing financial incentives for adopting sustainable farming practices.
The suspension has been met with significant backlash from the beef industry, with many stakeholders arguing that the decision undermines years of progress in sustainable agriculture. Adam Coffey, Deputy Chair of CATTLE Australia (CA), condemned the government’s move, calling it a “short-sighted betrayal” of the agricultural sector, one of the country’s largest sustainable land managers. Coffey emphasized that the Beef Herd Method has delivered over 953,000 ACCUs, equating to over one million tonnes of carbon emissions offset from just 11 projects. This figure highlights the method’s potential for broader impact, particularly if extended to more producers.
The suspension also comes when the Australian government has pushed for more agricultural landowners to participate in carbon offset programs. Industry leaders argue that halting access to the Beef Herd Method directly contradicts these objectives and prevents smaller producers from tapping into the carbon market as it evolves.
Moreover, the decision has raised concerns that it could stifle further innovation in the sector. The Australian beef industry has invested heavily in research and development to improve cattle genetics, pasture species, and nutritional additives to enhance sustainability. According to Coffey, this investment aligns with the broader goal of achieving climate neutrality, and the suspension of the Beef Herd Method sends the wrong message to those proactively working toward sustainable practices.
Despite the suspension, existing participants in the Beef Herd Methodology will continue to benefit from the system. However, the broader industry remains concerned about the implications of limiting new entrants. With the value of ACCUs likely to rise as the carbon market matures, there is a growing demand for more producers—particularly smaller and regional operations—to participate in the scheme.
Industry voices, including Coffey, urge the Federal Government to reconsider the suspension, arguing that it misses a crucial opportunity for larger-scale carbon abatement in rural and regional Australia. The government could encourage further innovation in the sector by reopening the Beef Herd Methodology to new projects while supporting the country’s emissions reduction targets.
The suspension has thus highlighted a fundamental tension between immediate regulatory concerns and long-term sustainability goals. While the ERAC’s concerns about compliance with integrity standards are valid, industry leaders argue that the decision fails to recognize the broader potential of the Beef Herd Method to drive substantial environmental and economic benefits. The beef industry remains hopeful that the government will take a more collaborative approach, ensuring that the carbon farming initiatives continue to evolve in a way that benefits both the environment and the farming community.
As the carbon offset market grows, the Australian beef industry’s role in reducing emissions and promoting sustainable agriculture will remain critical. However, this recent setback underscores the need for a careful balance between regulation, innovation, and the economic realities producers face. With the government’s review of carbon accounting methods still open until the end of January 2025, stakeholders remain optimistic that future policy decisions will better support the long-term viability of the Beef Herd Method and the broader carbon offset market.
Receive the latest insights on sustainability and energy management.
Sign Up Now
