EPA Rollbacks Could Undermine Coal Pollution Safeguards in Indiana, Says Sierra Club

Sierra Club’s New Tool Details Pollution at Risk as EPA Rules Are Dismantled

Posted

A new interactive dashboard launched by the Sierra Club is bringing visibility to the pollution consequences of the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back key Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) safeguards. Focused on Indiana—a state still heavily reliant on coal—the Trump Coal Pollution Dashboard reveals how at least 12 coal plants could avoid major emissions reductions if five targeted environmental rules are dismantled.

These federal rules were designed to reduce a wide range of pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, mercury, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, and toxic wastewater. The rollback of these protections threatens to not only increase environmental degradation, but also burden nearby communities with higher public health risks.

The Sierra Club’s dashboard breaks down pollution sources by facility and rule, mapping out which plants are affected and where regulatory gaps may occur. The five EPA standards tracked include:

  • Good Neighbor Plan: Targets smog-forming pollutants that drift across state lines.
  • Regional Haze Rule: Designed to improve visibility in national parks and wilderness areas by cutting power plant emissions.
  • Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS): Controls hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired power plants.
  • Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELG): Limits pollutants discharged into waterways from power plants.
  • Greenhouse Gas Standards (Section 111(d)): Regulates carbon dioxide emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired plants.

Key Emission Reductions at Risk

If implemented fully, these five safeguards could have reduced the following in Indiana alone:

  • Carbon dioxide by 55%, or 14.36 million tons annually
  • Nitrogen oxides by 75%, or 4,045 tons
  • Sulfur dioxide by 47%, or 11,276 tons
  • Coal wastewater pollution by 51%, or 14,050 pounds

Each metric underscores the scale of pollution control now at stake.

Coal Plants Named Across the State

Among the 12 plants listed in the dashboard, ownership spans major regional utilities including Duke Energy Indiana, AES, NIPSCO, Indiana Michigan Power, Alcoa, and the Indiana Municipal Power Agency. The dashboard identifies which rules would apply to each plant—and which would be sidestepped under the rollback scenario.

Notable examples include:

  • Rockport (Indiana Michigan Power): Regional Haze, ELG
  • Petersburg (AES): Good Neighbor Plan, Regional Haze
  • Gibson (Duke Energy): Greenhouse Gas Standards, Regional Haze
  • Merom (Hallador): Greenhouse Gas Standards, Regional Haze
  • Whitewater Valley (Indiana Municipal Power): Good Neighbor Plan, GHG, ELG

Duke Energy, which operates three of the named facilities, has been singled out by Sierra Club for advocating the most aggressively for these regulatory exemptions. Shortly after Trump’s inauguration, Duke reportedly signaled an intent to burn more coal and submitted a formal request to the EPA asking for multiple standards to be rescinded.

Duke Energy Indiana received the lowest grade of any major utility in the state on the Sierra Club’s most recent Clean Energy Transition Scorecard.

Community and Environmental Leader Reactions

Sierra Club officials say the stakes go far beyond emissions data—they point to real-world public health consequences if utilities continue to externalize pollution costs.

“As a monopoly utility, Duke is using its influence to externalize the cost of pollution generated at existing coal plants into the lungs of hard-working Hoosiers throughout the state,” said Robyn Skuya-Boss, Director of the Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter. “The only way utilities will clean up their act is if we work together to demand clean air, clean water, affordable energy, and a habitable planet.”

“The Trump Coal Pollution Dashboard demonstrates clearly that with every executive order, Donald Trump is recklessly releasing tons and tons of toxic, deadly chemicals into our air,” said Laurie Williams, Director of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign. “The American people should be outraged.”

Industry Implications: Reputational and Regulatory Risk

The findings come at a time when investor and community scrutiny of fossil-fuel-heavy utilities is intensifying. Utilities failing to invest in clean energy and pollution controls risk reputational damage, investor pressure, and regulatory backlash at the state level—even as federal enforcement is pulled back.

Indiana’s energy sector is under growing pressure to modernize. As neighboring states accelerate renewable deployment and carbon-neutral targets, Indiana’s continued reliance on aging coal infrastructure may prove economically and politically untenable in the long term.

Environment + Energy Leader