The recent approval of a comprehensive area plan (CAP) for oil and gas drilling at Lowry Ranch has sparked intense debate among residents, environmental advocates, and industry stakeholders.
The CAP, proposed by Denver-based Civitas Resources, covers 32,000 acres in Arapahoe County. It aims to streamline permitting for 156 new oil and gas wells at seven drilling locations.
Key concerns center around the drilling operations’ potential health and environmental impacts, mainly due to the proximity to the Aurora Reservoir, a critical drinking water source. Advocacy groups such as Save the Aurora Reservoir (STAR) and the CoPIRG Foundation argue that the area is ill-suited for extensive oil and gas development due to its closeness to residential neighborhoods, schools, and the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site.
“We are devastated by the Commission’s decision,” said Marsha Goldsmith Kamin, president of STAR. “This is without doubt the wrong decision for the health, safety, and environment of our community.”
In contrast, the Colorado State Land Board, which oversees the land management of Lowry Ranch, emphasizes the economic benefits of the oil and gas leases. In 2023 alone, these leases generated $209 million from over 830 contracts. Specifically, the lease held by Civitas has contributed $73 million in royalty payments and an additional $137 million in bonuses. This revenue is crucial as it supports public schools across Colorado.
Civitas Resources, which has managed the property under a lease issued in 2012, operates under a detailed CAP that covers 33,440 acres. The plan includes provisions to reduce environmental impact by consolidating drilling operations and employing emissions-reducing electric equipment. Despite these measures, the plan’s critics argue that it does not adequately address the community’s concerns about noise, truck traffic, air pollution, and potential risks from nearby hazardous sites.
The ECMC approved the CAP with a 3-1 vote, imposing conditions to mitigate some environmental and public health concerns. This marks the fourth consecutive CAP approval since the 2020 regulatory overhaul. Commissioner John Messner cast the lone dissenting vote, criticizing the proposal for being “vague and noncommittal” regarding its cumulative impacts on public health and the environment.
Commissioner Brett Ackerman noted that while the plan met regulatory standards, it felt “close” to needing further work to align more closely with regulatory intent and community concerns. The decision also includes provisions requiring Civitas to seek additional approval for each drilling location, potentially allowing for further adjustments to the plan based on ongoing assessments.
Civitas must navigate additional regulatory processes and community feedback as the project progresses. The ongoing debate reflects a broader challenge of balancing economic benefits with environmental protection and public health considerations. The outcome of this project will likely influence future discussions on energy development and community impact in Colorado.
